Travis Henry Gets the Shanny Shocker, Released

While there was speculation that wasn’t exactly welcomed back this season to the Denver Broncos, Mike Shanahan surprised us all by letting him go this early in the workouts. After all, the guy has nine baby mamas with one child apiece. Eighteen mouths don’t feed themselves, and Shanahan has to have some heart inside that burned-brown, leather exterior.
Denver Broncos v Oakland Raiders
Image details: Denver Broncos v Oakland Raiders served by picapp.com

Unfortunately for those 18 mouths, Henry injured his hamstring last month and most likely skipped out on treatments while he wasn’t showing up to OTAs. The situation didn’t win Henry any gold stars for effort and combined with Henry’s damaged rep from fighting a failed drug test suspension all of last season, the dogpile of problems probably caused Shanahan write him off as a bad influence on the litter of young running backs () the Broncos currently have at quarterback camp practicing already (, , newly drafted and last week’s new addition ).

Shanahan questioned Henry’s commitment to the game in his statement after the release. From ESPN.com:

“Although Travis has the ability to be one of the top running backs in the , we have to make decisions that are in the best interests of our organization and its goal of winning a Super Bowl,” Broncos coach Mike Shanahan said in a statement. “We did not feel his commitment to the Broncos was enough to warrant a spot on this football team.”

Later Monday, Shanahan said the move was more about Henry’s personality than his play.

“He’s just too inconsistent as a person. When you’re too inconsistent as a person, you usually aren’t going to win championships,” Shanahan said during a spring workout later in the day.

With released, the Denver Broncos running game gets a little murky — and that’s clearer than it was before. The situation in Denver was a weak link in 2007, and along with an inconsistent stock of wide receivers (WR), the running game is one of the few elements keeping from bringing his game together as a franchise quarterback (QB). (If you remember, I made some early off-season predictions for three Broncos stars in 2008, and I’m still standing behind them without Henry.)
Green Bay Packers v Denver Broncos
Image details: Green Bay Packers v Denver Broncos served by picapp.com

Rising to the top, averaged 5.2 yards per carry last season but isn’t the type (at least at his current weight and skill) to carry the full load even if he claims he will hit 2,000 yards this season.

It’s likely Young will split time with who obviously made Shanahan confident enough to let Henry go. Pittman, at 32, has past his prime, but he should contribute enough to spell Young and sub in on some passing plays until , the powerful rookie, is ready to take on a larger role.

Until the starting role becomes clearer, the situation will be the talk of all the Broncos training camp reports. If Young becomes the starter, look for him as a risky RB2 or a promising RB3 in round 3 or 4.

Pittman might be worth a pick in late rounds if he gets a spot in a committee with Young. If not, he falls into the same indefinite boat as , but being lost in the depth chart in Denver doesn’t mean you won’t lead the team in rushing by the end of the year.

The real sleeper of this bunch is . He could be the surprise to emerge for the Broncos this year and has nothing but upside. Stash him on your bench late or keep your eye on him on the waiver wire.

As for Henry, he is probably more likely to find work than , but there is not clear team interested in picking up him, his injury and his off-the-field problems right now. For now, he gets to stand in line with Alexander and Kevin Jones at the unemployment office.

Related Articles:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Share this post with your friends and/or enemies:

BallHype: hype it up!

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)